GMOVJ
Group: Members
Posts: 273
Joined: Dec. 1999 |
|
Posted: Nov. 16 2000, 05:16 |
|
Hey ! That's not what I think ! I was not talking about "inferior", but 'minor', refearing that it's usually consider (not by me, though) as : - not his best album - surprinsingly structured (the longest instrumental is 10 min) - un-remarkabled regarding to TBx, Om etc...
I may should have said 'middle', 'medium'...
Archangel, when I said it was considered as a 'minor' album, I was just spotting a fact : there's few post in this forum, whereas 'Greatest' or 'Badest' (this is just for explanation...) have plenty of them !
And by talking with some others and reading about it on the internet, I notice that a lot of people think it's a 'medium' album. QE2 don't come to mind immediatly when you're talking about MO. Even with fans, it's always about TB, Ommadawn, Incantations, Amarok, TB3, FMO but there is not or few word about QE2. But Taurus I is wonderfull, QE2 (the title) is terribly great ! And no one seems to think it's an important-masterpiece album. No one seems important to do analysis, exploration or comparisons of Taurus I and II...
Of course, this is not my opinion... Cheers, GMOVJ
PS : and this is not a cyberfight, we are just talking and exchanging with mutual respect point of view, no need to be sorry or excusing ourself every five seconds. No ? If no, sorry ;-)
-------------- Cheers, GMOVJ [URL=http://tubular.fodplanet.com]http://tubular.fodplanet.com[/URL] - The french speaking mailing list
|