nightspore
Group: Members
Posts: 4761
Joined: Mar. 2008 |
|
Posted: May 31 2009, 20:24 |
|
Quote (wiga @ May 31 2009, 04:20) | Nightspore - you know when you categorize Mike's work in terms of pre-Exegesis and post-Exegesis,(before and after therapy) - I was wondering if your dislike of Incantations had something to do then with the mood and emotions that it arouses, as much as anything. When you talk about the moods that appeal to you like - 'transcendental loss' -'soaring' -'haunting' - 'moving', are you grouping these emotions in the post-Exegesis category?
Although I pick up on these moods in Incantations, it is also much edgier - sharp, biting, provocative and daring. Is that what you hear to be pre-Exegesis, and does that have something to do with what doesn't appeal. |
Yes, Wiga - I think you're right. Incantations doesn't create any emotions in me at all - except with the Hiawatha setting, which creates exasperation, as the words and the music seem completely irrelevant to each other (the melody is the same irrespective of what is going on in the poem). I can, however, understand why someone who enjoyed the hypnotic effect of repetitive music might be drawn to it - I actually like the Kronos Quartet's "Waterwheel" for exactly this reason.
"Soaring" is certainly one word I'd put in the post-Exegesis category. I think it's even possible to be precise about the word musically. Take "Celt": you have a repetitive, low-pitched, restrictive melody for the start of the piece: and then along comes that guitar solo with incredible range and diversity. It lifts the piece on to another plane. With Incantations on the other hand, you don't seem to get that contrast; it's nearly all repetition.
|