nightspore
Group: Members
Posts: 4761
Joined: Mar. 2008 |
|
Posted: Jan. 28 2010, 20:17 |
|
Quote (Ugo @ Jan. 28 2010, 19:06) | @ nightspore: well, back in Stockhausen's time, that wasn't called "sampling"... it was called "copying", "lack of originality" or, still worse, "plagiarism". I don't think that those definitions indicate that people were really appreciating it. Nowadays, sampling is considered adventurous because it's done through technology, and because people (generally) sample small excerpts of other people's songs, not substantial melodic material (as Stockhausen did) and build their own music over those excerpts. Of course, the more original the final song sounds, the better the artist who did the sampling is. Just to quote a recent example, Whithey Houston's "Million Dollar Bill" sampled "We're Getting Stronger" by Loleatta Holloway. Yet Whitney's song was a hit, and was also quite highly praised, and no-one said she was unoriginal. |
Stockhausen used tapes, so I guess that counts as technology... It's ages since I listened to Hymnen, as it's not generally very pleasant to listen to, but I seem to remember that he didn't use substantial melodic fragments either - just snatches,processed and distorted in various ways. Certainly melody was conspicuous by its absence, at least on a casual listening!
Re your example: Dario G's use of "Life in a Northern Town" would be another illustration.
|