Inkanta
Group: Admins
Posts: 1453
Joined: Feb. 2000 |
|
Posted: April 29 2008, 22:10 |
|
Quote (Olivier @ April 29 2008, 16:18) | Sorry for being so slow... We didn't have a chance to finish discussing it and come to a resolution yet. To be sure it won't bother us again, I've suggested to ban any mention of The Millennium Bell anywhere on tubular.net but other admins are not sure to agree. Actually, did an artist ever abjure some of his work, a while after public release and forbid further duplication and distribution? I may have a few suggestions and it could create a lot of buzz around the artist too, and lot of relief for most of people too, he could even pay people to return their copy for destruction, or people could post destruction videos ou youtube too (those with digital copies wouldn't have to permanently damage their iPod). The way it works these days, I guess they wouldn't have the right to do so. |
Hahahaha! For years, it seemed like Heaven's Open generated a lot of discussion like TMB does these days. I actually like TMB and used it to introduce several people to Mike Oldfield's music. When the kids were younger (heh, weren't we all, nine years ago? ) they and their friends used to go into hysterics over "Sexy Woman." Of course, it elicited from me the pefunctory diatribe on Inkaic culture and architecture. Their eyes nearly rolled out of their heads onto the floor....out the front door and under a bush.
But yeah, sad to say, during that time the record companies pretty much owned the rights, so the artists couldn't buy back their worked if they thought it sucked nor forbid further distribution. These days, seems to me that they might be retaining a few more rights???
-------------- "No such thing as destiny; only choices exist." From: Moongarden's "Solaris."
|