Milamber
Group: Musicians
Posts: 2274
Joined: Feb. 2010 |
|
Posted: Sep. 01 2010, 21:07 |
|
Quote (Ugo @ Sep. 02 2010, 08:31) | Quote (milamber @ Aug. 29 2010, 15:54) | Thats more or less what I thought you meant but the problem is (11:59/13:38) the slower beat allows much more expression but the faster one gives more of an impact back into the slower heavy part that comes next but you have to play the fast one as straight time with less fills what to do what to do? |
Do it fast. And do all the fills you want, but beware of the risk of going off-beat, which is high.
P.S. If you have the old original mix of HR somewhere (not the so-called "1974 original mix" on the new version - that's not the original 1974 mix, as it's been re-touched!! ), listen for the percussive "beat" done by the nutcracker in that section. That is the beat you should re-interpret - not copy or re-do, but re-interpret. |
My old cd copy of HR was bought around 1986-87 is this the version you mean. HR CDV 2013. 1984.
|