Sir Mustapha
Group: Musicians
Posts: 2802
Joined: April 2003 |
|
Posted: Mar. 28 2008, 20:13 |
|
Quote (Alan D @ Mar. 28 2008, 17:08) | It only seems ridiculous if you think the listener is being deliberately reminded of the title - because that would indeed be pointless. But maybe the title came at the end, driven by the composition process, and not at the beginning. I imagine him putting this piece together, and he's playing with the virtual vocal software and the musical effect of various words; and he finds that the word 'slipstream' seems to fit, and seems to match the rest of the music, so he puts that in at various points, and likes the sound. And then, at the end, he has the complete piece, with this word 'slipstream' built in as part of its fabric. So he calls it 'Slipstream'. Looked at in that way, it doesn't seem pointless - well, no more pointless than most titles seem, anyway. |
That seems plausible. I don't doubt a similar process happened with Resolution, and of course, both Tears of an Angel and Surfing have full-fledged lyrics, so they're beyond questioning.
I still find the case of Sunset unforgivable, though... To me, at least, it's clear that the tune was either inspired by or designed to evoke a sunset, with the "hovering in mid-air" pad synths, the air between the notes and everything. If the tune really sounds like a sunset transcribed into music (and I say, even to my standards, it's pretty darn close), that should suffice. But the whispered, tuneless, off-beat "sunset" is like Mike is making sure that we'll all know what he was trying to do. A little bit of confidence never hurts, eh? Besides, if the song doesn't sound like sunset to some people and sounds like something else entirely, what's the matter? It wasn't a Kraftwerk album, was it?
-------------- Check out http://ferniecanto.com.br for all my music, including my latest albums: Don't Stay in the City, Making Amends and Builders of Worlds. Also check my Bandcamp page: http://ferniecanto.bandcamp.com
|