Man In The Rain
Group: Members
Posts: 405
Joined: April 2002 |
|
Posted: May 13 2003, 23:21 |
|
Hmm, the David Porter review seems a bit of a waste of space. Interesting knowing that Mike had said he would re-record it back in 1982, but it says absolutely nothing about this new version, no insight or personal opinion on it, and it ends with yet another "how about another Amarok?" Whereas yes it would be nice and if Mike read it that would be good too, maybe we should not rush ahead and focus on the latest project Mike has poured his heart, soul, energy and time into, and actually show some appreciation for it rather than merely saying that the end of part 2 still brings a tear to one's eye. Maybe Mike would read that and think, oh they're not really interested in what I'm doing anymore, just what they want me to do? Sorry, I am aware this may seem somewhat attacking, but I feel it a shame that there would be countless fans who could have given a far more tantalising and interesting preview to this most-awaited of albums instead of completely failing to talk about what is supposed to be being reviewed.
[/rant over]
-------------- Hergest Ridge 165 - Ommadawn 038 - Incantations 243
|