Ugo
Group: Members
Posts: 5495
Joined: April 2000 |
|
Posted: Aug. 17 2011, 20:10 |
|
Quote (0 @ 1(I1)+Aug. 18 2011, 01:56) | [...] it would look as if the bell was peg legged [...] |
If the pole was properly placed (and, like the one in the pic, much less brighter and less highlighted than the main sculpture), I don't think it would. You are very much right, however, in saying that a two-dimensional drawing (and one made just with dashes) does not fully render your idea. But surely you, as an engineer, have the capability to do a fully-rendered, three-dimensional drawing. There's no hurry in doing this, you may take all the time you need.
@ nightspore: the Bent Bell would never look like Penrose's (rather than Escher's) triangle because it's not an open shape, and its lower ends form a cross with each other. I think a solid structure has to be open, at least in part, to form an impossible image - like the other well-known one, the Necker Cube. Maybe it would be great if the Bent Bell was built out of two or three separate parts which look horrible and meaningless by themselves, but which magically combine into the Bent Bell shape when seen from a certain angle. As for the original album cover, well, that's surrealistically impossible in itself, as the Bent Bell hovers.
-------------- Ugo C. - a devoted Amarokian
|